LTRB Responds to “Future Movement” Statement: They Should Protect Stability with Responsible Stances
Local Editor
Commenting on the Future Movement statement issued Wednesday, Loyalty to the Resistance Bloc issued the following statement:
In its latest statement, Future Bloc expressed lamentations over being excluded from power, along with fabricated concerns and skepticism.
Until this moment, the time taken to form the awaited government still hasn't reached the same time taken to form both former Future Movement governments. So why the intimidations, suspicion provocations, and incitements, and whose interests do they serve?
Normal complications are witnessed with each government formation, and the PM-designate is making confident strides to form his government, and all the majority parties are cooperative with him in this regard. The Majority is practicing its legal right in requesting its demands and points of view without any pressure, blackmailing, or lying.
What the country is being subject to today of negativities and problems is not but a result of the Future Movement's policies and its former government, which turned Lebanon into a "farm" shared by who has the interests of putting this country under the US administration's control.
The fact that the Future Bloc defends the policies of repression, injustice, and oppression practiced against an unarmed nation of the Arab region, clearly represents the truth about the political oppressing path the bloc follows.
This path cannot be overlooked only through cheering for the youth uprising in Tunisia and Egypt, because everyone knows the level of their [Future Movement] wagers and dependency on the ousted Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's role in their stances, visits, and loyalty.
When Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah called against the prolonged and excessive violence against the majority of a peaceful Arab nation in its country, he was not meddling in internal affairs, but rather was speaking out of concern about the dangers of the practiced violence, and its negative repercussions on the stability in our entire Arab region, seeking conflict prevention so that the US and "Israel" would not exploit it.
He [Sayyed Nasrallah] didn't need to justify his humanitarian sensitivity, which he shares with all liberal and loyal people in the world.
His Eminence adopted the rightful and honorable stance without being stopped by any attempts in Lebanon to exploit this noble humanitarian sensitivity in order to incite this or that regime against some Lebanese, so that we would stay silent before all unjust practices and violations. The situation would rather become more complicated, and that is what we do not seek for ethical reasons and other reasons related to the region's stability, which Lebanon is affected by.
The official Media in Syria has presented a sample of the suspicious Future Movement's involvement in Syrian internal affairs, and no one was convinced with their [Future Movement] denial in this regard.
"Do not speak about spheres, for you are the product of some, and you should think about how to protect the stability in this country with responsible stances and performances".
What Wikileaks revealed about some of you [March 14] is not but evidence on the rightfulness of our evaluation of what they have committed of sins against the resistance and the country.
Commenting on the Future Movement statement issued Wednesday, Loyalty to the Resistance Bloc issued the following statement:
In its latest statement, Future Bloc expressed lamentations over being excluded from power, along with fabricated concerns and skepticism.
Until this moment, the time taken to form the awaited government still hasn't reached the same time taken to form both former Future Movement governments. So why the intimidations, suspicion provocations, and incitements, and whose interests do they serve?
Normal complications are witnessed with each government formation, and the PM-designate is making confident strides to form his government, and all the majority parties are cooperative with him in this regard. The Majority is practicing its legal right in requesting its demands and points of view without any pressure, blackmailing, or lying.
What the country is being subject to today of negativities and problems is not but a result of the Future Movement's policies and its former government, which turned Lebanon into a "farm" shared by who has the interests of putting this country under the US administration's control.
The fact that the Future Bloc defends the policies of repression, injustice, and oppression practiced against an unarmed nation of the Arab region, clearly represents the truth about the political oppressing path the bloc follows.
This path cannot be overlooked only through cheering for the youth uprising in Tunisia and Egypt, because everyone knows the level of their [Future Movement] wagers and dependency on the ousted Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's role in their stances, visits, and loyalty.
When Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah called against the prolonged and excessive violence against the majority of a peaceful Arab nation in its country, he was not meddling in internal affairs, but rather was speaking out of concern about the dangers of the practiced violence, and its negative repercussions on the stability in our entire Arab region, seeking conflict prevention so that the US and "Israel" would not exploit it.
He [Sayyed Nasrallah] didn't need to justify his humanitarian sensitivity, which he shares with all liberal and loyal people in the world.
His Eminence adopted the rightful and honorable stance without being stopped by any attempts in Lebanon to exploit this noble humanitarian sensitivity in order to incite this or that regime against some Lebanese, so that we would stay silent before all unjust practices and violations. The situation would rather become more complicated, and that is what we do not seek for ethical reasons and other reasons related to the region's stability, which Lebanon is affected by.
The official Media in Syria has presented a sample of the suspicious Future Movement's involvement in Syrian internal affairs, and no one was convinced with their [Future Movement] denial in this regard.
"Do not speak about spheres, for you are the product of some, and you should think about how to protect the stability in this country with responsible stances and performances".
What Wikileaks revealed about some of you [March 14] is not but evidence on the rightfulness of our evaluation of what they have committed of sins against the resistance and the country.
Comments
