No Script

Please Wait...

Al-Ahed Telegram

Assange ‘Dangerously Close’ To US Extradition After Losing Latest Legal Appeal

Assange ‘Dangerously Close’ To US Extradition After Losing Latest Legal Appeal
folder_openUnited Kingdom access_time3 months ago
starAdd to favorites

By Staff, Agencies

Julian Assange is “dangerously close” to being extradited to the US after losing his latest legal appeal, his family and observers of his long-running legal challenge say.

His lawyers say they will appeal again to the same court, amid growing fears he could spend the rest of his life in prison for publishing thousands of classified military and diplomatic documents.

In a three-page judgment handed down on Tuesday, UK high court judge Justice Jonathan Swift rejected all eight grounds of Assange’s appeal against the US’s extradition order, signed by then UK home secretary Priti Patel in June last year.

But Assange’s wife, Stella Assange, said her husband would make a “renewed application for appeal to the high court” next week.

The matter would then be heard before two new judges in a public hearing, Stella Assange said.

“And we remain optimistic that we will prevail and that Julian will not be extradited to the United States where he faces charges that could result in him spending the rest of his life in a maximum-security prison for publishing true information that revealed war crimes committed by the US government.”

Assange’s father, John Shipton, said his son’s grounds for a further hearing were “clear, firm and just.”

“Julian’s family watch on, horrified, and all fair-minded people the world over watch with profound disquiet and alarm,” he said.

Assange’s appeal argued that Patel, as home secretary, erred in her decision to approve the extradition order because the request violated the US-UK extradition treaty which states “extradition shall not be granted if the offence for which extradition is requested is a political offence.” His legal team has consistently maintained that the US desire to try Assange is politically motivated.

The appeal also argued Assange was being prosecuted for protected speech, and that the extradition request itself was an abuse of process.

Assange’s legal team has also said the US government has consistently misrepresented the core facts of the case to the British courts.

Swift’s rejection of the appeal grounds leaves only one final step in the UK courts: the defense has five working days to submit an appeal of 20 pages to a panel of two judges, who will convene a public hearing.

There are no further appeal avenues at the domestic level. Assange could still fight the extradition at the European court of human rights, which last December confirmed that an application from Assange had been received.