’Saudi’ and the Recoiling Terrorism Bomb

Al-Binaa, Ameen Mohammad Hoteit

Without flinching, shamelessly did the Saudi delegate stand before the United Nations demanding to scribe the Lebanese Hizbullah on the list of designated terrorist organizations . He claimed that the party's men are fighting in Syria alongside the Syrian government.

Surely this delegate was incapable of presenting a logical argument to be taken by a listener as an anchor to accept negotiating the demand, or a solid basis for an approving decision to be built upon.

The aggressive Saudi position against the resistance remains an old deal, especially with the structural cohesion between the Saudi Wahhabi movement and the global Zionist movement, which Hizbullah fights in defense of the Arab and Muslim rights.

This similarity drives the Saudis- without least doubt- to take aggressive stances against every political entity or military organization or even civil social association, simply if their positions contained what hurts "Israel" or threatens its invasive colonial plan to take over the Arab and Islamic land in Palestine.
And in this sense, no observer can forget the Saudi position against the Lebanese Resistance in 2006. This position was taken at an extremely critical time in the Lebanese history.

As the "Israeli" air jets were pouring rage upon the Lebanese people in a systematic destructive operation, the Saudis emerged up to the world in a position, that encouraged "Israel" to continue its destructive war.
They further blamed the resistance - led by Hizbullah - for the consequences of war and the following devastation. The Kingdom described the Resistance to be a bunch of adventurers who are bringing sorrow upon Lebanon.

The Gulf Kingdom also ordered the Lebanese government, which followed the Saudi' guiding- to repudiate the honor of the resistance and their actions, and to act immediately to disarm the resistance, to all there is of positions that drive each and every free honorable man to have shame.

Knowing that the Saudi position against the resistance is no new, the obvious natural question that is asked is about the reason for bringing this subject up today, although the Saudis know, or should have known, that its request shall not be fulfilled. It is worth mentioning that the majority of those who may have previously had any concern to suggest something similar, have closed their cases, and went about opening communication canals with Hizbullah and the various components of the Resistance bloc all the way from Syria to Iran.
This means that the Saudi request had come at a timing simply to be considered incompatible with the general environment of the country, that is to say it is a request against the sense of reality and reason. In fact it is the antithesis of scientific reason. Terrorism has an academic and political definition that does not apply at all to Hizbullah, in no plausible sense.

And here we remind those demanding such an illogical request, that terrorism is the act based on which physical and sentimental violence is sought, in attempt to achieve and acquire an illicit goal through undermining or grazing the illegal rights, and violating the legal and moral value system which already sponsors these rights in existence and practice. Whoever acts convulsively on his own or instigates such action or aids the doer in any sort of sentimental or materialistic manner is considered terrorist. This includes the media application and intellectual or jurisprudential justification for these actions.

If we were to apply this definition, we are relying on what has been settled academically and what is admitted by objective politicians who are nondependent on any colonial party that rejects any definition of terrorism in order to remain untied and continue to abide by elastic concepts that it confines, stretches and manipulates in any direction serving its interests.

We remind of president Hafiz al-Asad's insistence on admitting an international conclusive definition for terrorism, and how far the United States went insisting on rejecting that. Therefore, if we were to apply this definition on the Syrian field and the Saudi contribution in that filed alongside others, we arrive to a result completely opposing the Saudi demand, and this is what we meant saying that this demand is against the flow of reality.

To further explain, we come back to confirm what has become acknowledged, that what is happening in Syria is a licit self-defense pursued by the Syrian government that is voted by the people against an illegal armed aggression brought by external powers using local and foreign assets.

Meanwhile, the Saudi continues to contribute directly and indirectly beyond the assaulting forces with numerous of what the latter use or need in the assault. It is only necessary here to mention that the armed groups responsible for these attacks are carrying out a huge deal of material and moral violence what lead the United Nations itself to include them in the international terrorism lists, and those are the same groups which abide by the takfirist wahabist doctrine, who draw weapons against the Syrian people, and the national Syrian government based on what Saudi wants.

Not to mention that the funding of such groups is through Gulf money, and from Saudi itself, as well as from countries and committees Saudi already controls their decisions. Last but not least of what has been mentioned, is that the Saudi media against the Syrian country and its legal national institutions, is the same media serving these groups in a certainly obvious manner.

Thus, and to put it simply, we find in reality that these groups which the United Nations decided to consider terrorist, which they are, for what they are doing in reality of acts to be considered a typical image of terrorism.

We find that Saudi is supplying these groups with doctrine, money, and media, not to mention the preparation and personnel, and with that said, any sound person realizes who is the terrorist in actions and tools, and who is terrorist in agitation and support, and this image shall not be replaced by the Saudi government's hunting down of the terrorists who assaulted Shiites in the eastern Saudi area.

As for Hizbullah, it is in contrast to what has been mentioned. Hizbullah fought "Israel" and expelled it out of a land the latter had invaded in the south of Lebanon in 2000, and worthily earned the title of resistance, which no man of reason would even debate, and fought "Israel" year 2006, and prevented it from invading land in Lebanon and reassured its resistive description, and is fighting the terrorist takfirist groups described by the Security Council as terrorist.

Hizbullah is fighting on the Syrian soil due to a strategic alliance with Syria in the Resistance bloc, what made its fight of the same essence as that of the Syrian government: a defensive fight in the face of terrorism.

Therefore, in Syria there is terrorism supported by Saudi- which participates actively in that terrorism, and a fight against terrorism lead by the Syrian government alongside Hizbullah, its ally in the Resistance axis.
After these facts and information we resume in our research concerning what drove Saudi to launch its smoke bomb in the Security Council, the bomb that brought tears to no one but itself, we find in our opinion that it is due to solid strings in the general scene in the area, in which Saudi observes in pain:
The recent "Israeli" talk about Hizbullah's strength and their progression in the balance deference equation to an extent where the debate concerning its disarmament or even confinement became nonsense or even a matter of ridicule or fiction.

The progressive field achievements of the Arab Syrian Army, which seems to be frightening the assaulting forces, is preparing for the Aleppo battle which will be the circumstantial strategic turning point in the fate of the assault on Syria, after which no hope shall remain for the enemies of Syria in achieving any of what they had been aiming for.

The point where negotiations have reached in the Iranian Nuclear case, as the talk about a foreign military act against Iran or the upheaving of the sanctions became pointless, because the opposite is expected. It is no longer a case of whether an agreement might be achieved, or whether Iran would victor, but the question became when the agreement shall be signed, and what size the Iranian victory is, unlike what Saudi wants any way.

And finally the political and non-political breach, Hizbullah and its allies have brought in the internal Lebanese equations. The failure of the Saudi plan in Lebanon to create and support terrorist groups it induces, in order to barter their existence and armament for Hizbullah and its arms. However, these terrorist groups failed and Hizbullah shined furthermore in a way that embarrassed Saudi and their followers.

The Saudis now want to give these followers some sort of pressure card that might be of use in their confrontation or debate if that is to happen with, and it is a debate Saudi sees bitter but necessary at a certain stage.
For these reasons, the Saudi came with its sound bomb to state that it is present, and to test the efficiency of the money it is paying for these European countries or others.

It is money that is paid as a price for position against the Resistance bloc in all its components, but the result however, as everyone witnessed is a zero that does not change the equation. It would neither affect what the men had imposed in the battle field, nor what the leaders had resolved in the corridors and political lobbies... Hence, Hizbullah is a resistance, and an essential element in the resistance axis, fighting the authentic terrorism represented by "Israel", and the Takfiri terrorism made up in the name of Islam, brought up in the Saudi lap, which is fighting an alternative war for "Israel" and with that Saudi in it demand had produced an opportunity to undress its stands, which is recoiling on itin description.