About the Accusations...Beneficiaries
Ibrahim al-Amin
28-12-2013, Al-Akhbar
There is no need to explain to those people in the Future Movement and March 14 accuse Hizbullah of being behind the assassination of former minister Mohammed Shatah.
The logic of those is based on rather a political or a non-political conviction that Hizbullah is able to perform such assassination.
They further claim that the party doesn't want any sound of opposition and that it seeks to terrorize any voice opposing it.
A long time ago , back to at least nine years, the same team- before turning to a political coalition and after the Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon - accused Hizbullah and the Lebanese -Syrian security system of being behind a series of political assassinations that took place in Lebanon, and mainly targeted figures from March 14.
In the first stage , it was said that the party , and Damascus behind it, weren't concerned that the resurrection is to be due if they assassinated this figure or that.
It was also said that the one who decided, miscalculated the reaction in a good way , especially that he was neither interested in people's madness nor with regional and international accounts . Then, the same side insisted on accusing the same team, saying that Hizbullah does not want to stop terrorizing its opponents.
Meanwhile, a lot of talk passed claiming that the party is just a tool in the hands of the Syrian regime, and that it is pressured and crammed here and there.
They also alleged that Hizbullah is obliged to do the same thing , because it has no way to face its opponents away from murder. Then, another rhetoric emerged, claiming that Hizbullah intended through murders to disrupt the work of the Special Tribunal to Lebanon.
After that, they accused it of the same act because they want to flood the tribunal with files and make its mission difficult. Then, they said that the party wants to expand the circle of war from Syria to Lebanon, and to cut the road in front of any attempt to properly rebuild the political life.
Each time , March 14 reached the same conclusion: Here is, the killer continues to bloodshed , and it is losing!
Often, one can understand that the tension, anger, and hatred can lead to political accusation , or even to fabricate a file for the other opponent. But in our case, we are forced to raise innocent or malicious questions:
- Is Hizbullah stupid to the point that it did not learn of the first assassination, and does its history indicate failures that make it a prisoner of this game ?
- Was the outcome of these assassinations in the interest of Hizbullah as a resistance movement, a political movement , or a front that represents today the most prominent polarization center of the Shi'ite Arabs?
- Is Hizbullah an employee to its opponents , so that it feeds them whenever they face hardship , and helps them to provide climates to take practical steps or target it directly?
- Isn't Hizbullah aware of any other way to intimidate its opponents , given that the party didn't succeed in the first, second and third ... Etc. trials?
- Does Hizbullah , i.e. busy from head to toe in confronting the most extraordinary situation in Syria and the region , find itself in a difficult situation that makes it face its domestic opponents through such an assassination ?
- If Hizbullah's refusal to the formation of a government today is a reality , does it grant its local, regional and international opponents the needed pressure tool to make this government a reality and a pension ?
- Did the party pledge, each time Lebanon has a date with the work of the STL , to kill an opponent figure to further incite the tribunal's actions against it?
- If the party was professional enough to make its opponents accuse it with all such actions, why doesn't it choose a more representative target from the opponents ?
In the axiomatic politics , what happened had been expected. No observer can carry a nominal list of people and places. More scientific estimates, based on data and facts , say that Lebanon is on the verge of madness and more and more of blood. And as in every time, Lebanon accommodates global killers as it accommodates a crowd of its dead sons.
And he who doesn't want to hear the voice of reason , can make the tears shut the eyes, and anger clutches the muscles so that we walk towards a devastating abyss.
Lebanon, which lives under the Syrian crisis will be more hot whenever the picture is modified in the Levant.
There is no security system, from all over the world, that hadn't come to Lebanon, carrying information and data for the "open field" in front of "generations of terrorists".
And he who seeks to politically blow up the situation through adventurous steps, is similar to those who strive to make Lebanon a launching pad for terrorist operations or a center for terrorist activity, linked to what is happening in Syria.
And also similar to them are those who think that such a crime , can fluctuate the political situation in the interest of this group or that.
It is clear that the debate has no place amid the political and security madness. It is also clear the March 14 team wants to continue dancing above the blood to invest here or there .
It is further more clear that some sides, who want to transfer Lebanon to a more cruel stage in the existing international-regional war, especially in Syria , needs only wrath, strife, and madness . In this case , how can we go step back to review the whole scene , and to carefully consider in a country that has nothing left to it but its name?
*Translated by website team
