No Script

Please Wait...

Al-Ahed Telegram

Saudi Arabia: The Democratic, Popular, Communist and Wahhabi Kingdom!

Saudi Arabia: The Democratic, Popular, Communist and Wahhabi Kingdom!
folder_openAl-Ahed Translations access_time11 years ago
starAdd to favorites

Qassem al-Ajrash - Iraqi Muraqeb newspaper

Some writers and analysts, extremist in their opinion, decide that the state of popular broiling and the social movements and rebellious acts is defined in what they misleadingly call ‘An Arab Spring'. These [authors and writers] are tools belonging to the world major powers (the US, UK, France and Turkey) who play the role of reconstructing the political map of the region.

Meanwhile, another extremist camp are totally on the opposite side, they see that the events so far have expressed a popular will that has tolerated the ruling dictatorships; a will that decided to take over and break the manacles with its own hands, by that setting itself to freedom.

By that I mean, beside these two extremist opinions, I have a third vision that sits in between!
There is no doubt that detached and fitting conditions to the birth of protests, which soon became revolutions in the Arab world have been existing since long ago.

We should have asked why so late until these emerged? Especially that corruption, oppression, falsifying and absenting conscience, absence of democracy, and other reasons have been prevailing in our societies yet the revolutions erupted at a specific time, after [Egyptian ousted President Husni] Mubarak ruled 30 years and [Tunisian ousted President Zein al-Abedeen] Bin Ali ruled quarter a century, while the [Libyan ousted President Muammar] Qadhafi ruled 40 years and so forth!

It is naïve to say these movements were of domestic nature, and sprung from Arab reality, and neglect the fact that these were breached by international powers that aim at realizing their interests far from any Arab regimes' interference [be it Qatar, KSA, UAE, and other Gulf preserves] which remain to be effective tools in the hands of the West and its scheme.

Usually, Arab popular movements start with simple and precise demands, majorly in response to a trivial mistake committed by the regime. These may start as well when the authorities make certain procedures due to an economic force majeure, such as the case is these days in Sudan.

The following is what happened: The Western major powers, topped by the United States entered the game, and wanted to reconstruct the political scenario in such a way that suits its interests, executing the plan via their tools embodied in the Saudi-Qatari-Turkish demon.

Henceforth, the Arab revolutions have become a fertile soil for blatant foreign intervention that does not care about spreading democracy and freedom but rather cares about its own interests.

It seems awkward that non-democrats work for spreading democracy...If so is true, we would have seen the Saudi, Arab, Democratic, Popular, Communist, Wahhabi Kigdom? Where is this kingdom?!


Comments