Hart: STL Possibly American and “Israeli” Tool
Prominent Western author, former Independent Television News and BBC Mideast correspondent, wrote an article on teh 18th of January in which he acknowledged that Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is right in believing that the tribunal is an American and "Israeli" tool targeting the resistance.
"It's not impossible that Hizbullah's leader Hassan Nasrallah was right when he described the tribunal investigating the assassination of Lebanon's Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005 as "an American and "Israeli" tool," reads the article.
He expressed belief at the same time that "Israel's" military and political leaders as those with most to gain from a successful attempt to pin the blame on Hizbullah.
Hart recalled "Israel's" devastation of Lebanon's infrastructure in 2006 which resulted in nothing but failure, noting that "Israel's leaders thought that by doing so they would turn the Lebanese army and the people against Hizbullah.
"In other words, by massively punishing all of Lebanon, "Israel's" leaders believed they could push the Lebanese army and people into doing the Zionist state's dirty work," he wrote, emphasizing "But once again "Israeli" strategy (state terrorism pure and simple) backfired. Israel's 2006 war united the Lebanese (more or less) and Hizbullah came out of it stronger not weaker."
Hart referred to the origin of the resistance movements and the reason behind their existence is the Zionist entity's occupation to territory.
According to the Western author, "Israel" believes that Hizbullah today is much better armed than it was in 2006. "It has rockets and (some say) missiles, primarily for defense, but which could do a great deal of damage to and in "Israel's" cities, including Tel Aviv," Hart highlighted.
indirectly pointing out the STL, the "Israeli"-US soft war tool which they think would enable them accomplish the mission, Hart writes "Before they go to war again, "Israel's" leaders (and their unquestioning American allies) know they need to discredit Hizbullah in order to greatly improve the prospects of other Lebanese forces making effective common cause with Zionism to destroy Sayyed Nasrallah and all he and his movement represent."
"Who could have had the necessary access?" he wondered. Then comes the answer: possibly a Mossad agent, also possibly a CIA agent, but unlikely a Hezbollah agent...
"I must confess, and do so cheerfully," Hart admitted continuing "that one thing above all others has always puzzled me about the circumstances of the explosion that killed Rafik Hariri and 22 others. His wealth and contacts would have ensured the he had state of the art electronic protection when he was on the move."
He asked "Who could have had the necessary access?" answering his own question, Hart said it is more likely a Mossad agent or CIA agent, but very unlikely a Hizbullah agent.
Comments
- Related News