Britain Backs Off Anti-Criminal Rules, Provides Safety for Zionist War Criminals
Local Editor
After a previous series of flight cancelation of Zionist "Israeli" officers' visits to Britain, British government officials move step by step towards changing the law, which states the arrest of "Israeli" war criminals visiting Britain.
This step came after Udi Ben-Moha, senior "Israeli" army commander, stepped back from his intention to move to Britain for education, over fears that he could be arrested for war crimes he had committed.
A major political confusion occurred earlier, after an arrest warrant was issued for "Israeli" official Tzipi Livni over her war crimes, which pushed the British government to avoid the return of such confusions. The London-based Jewish Chronicle reported.
It seems that the British government wants to sooth the tension and relations between moth parts, in order to make it easier for its Foreign Minister, William Hague to visit the "Israeli" enemy. On his behalf, according to the Jewish Chronicle, Hague described the situation as "unsatisfactory and indefensible", urging to put it right.
Knowing the seriousness of this matter, British MP James Arbuthnot, also chairman of Conservative Friends of "Israel", said, "I would be surprised if it is resolved within the next week because it requires legislations".
Ron Prosor, the "Israeli" ambassador to Britain, urged for a concerted effort, in order to amend the law on universal jurisdiction, where he said that current laws were being used by activists, in order to "demonise and deligitimise" "Israel". He also revealed how easy for it be for "Israeli" criminals to be arrested with any possession of arrest warrant by any individual.
The Jewish Chronicle reported an "Israeli" army forces source that said, "Israel had received assurances from the previous government and the Conservation Party that the law could be changed".
The source added, "Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian activists, including some "Israelis", are doing everything to hound out officers".
This is very ironic. Wouldn't releasing criminals, with high-rated crimes, letting them go free to commit crimes again, considered a crime? Isn't changing laws considered a felony? Britain would surly in a very sensitive position if it did agree on changing rules, which apparently it would.
Britain is putting the whole world exposed for new "Israeli" criminal threats for its own international-foreign relations' sake. "International community should put a stop for this", a sentence said too much, yet no reply.
After a previous series of flight cancelation of Zionist "Israeli" officers' visits to Britain, British government officials move step by step towards changing the law, which states the arrest of "Israeli" war criminals visiting Britain.
This step came after Udi Ben-Moha, senior "Israeli" army commander, stepped back from his intention to move to Britain for education, over fears that he could be arrested for war crimes he had committed.
A major political confusion occurred earlier, after an arrest warrant was issued for "Israeli" official Tzipi Livni over her war crimes, which pushed the British government to avoid the return of such confusions. The London-based Jewish Chronicle reported.
It seems that the British government wants to sooth the tension and relations between moth parts, in order to make it easier for its Foreign Minister, William Hague to visit the "Israeli" enemy. On his behalf, according to the Jewish Chronicle, Hague described the situation as "unsatisfactory and indefensible", urging to put it right.
Knowing the seriousness of this matter, British MP James Arbuthnot, also chairman of Conservative Friends of "Israel", said, "I would be surprised if it is resolved within the next week because it requires legislations".
Ron Prosor, the "Israeli" ambassador to Britain, urged for a concerted effort, in order to amend the law on universal jurisdiction, where he said that current laws were being used by activists, in order to "demonise and deligitimise" "Israel". He also revealed how easy for it be for "Israeli" criminals to be arrested with any possession of arrest warrant by any individual.
The Jewish Chronicle reported an "Israeli" army forces source that said, "Israel had received assurances from the previous government and the Conservation Party that the law could be changed".
The source added, "Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian activists, including some "Israelis", are doing everything to hound out officers".
This is very ironic. Wouldn't releasing criminals, with high-rated crimes, letting them go free to commit crimes again, considered a crime? Isn't changing laws considered a felony? Britain would surly in a very sensitive position if it did agree on changing rules, which apparently it would.
Britain is putting the whole world exposed for new "Israeli" criminal threats for its own international-foreign relations' sake. "International community should put a stop for this", a sentence said too much, yet no reply.
Comments
- Related News
