Alahednews
english.alahednews.com.lb
Al-Ahed Telegram
Ankara: US Decision to Open Embassy in Quds in May Damages Peace US Mediation Deadlocked As Lebanon’s President Sends Warning To «Israel» «Alaa Bosnia»: Martyr Leader Ali Fayad Gov’t Official: Death Toll from Somalia Blasts Rises to 45 Trump Talks New Gun Measures, Gun Owners Talk «Betrayal» Zarif: Daesh not Over, US Relocating It Don’t Be Fooled by Saudi «Aid» Efforts in Yemen Afghanistan Attacks: At Least 23 Killed in Multiple Suicide Bombings Drones and Jets: The «Brazenness» Belongs to «Israel» «Israel» Living in Horror: Ongoing Border Constructions Since 2014 Sayyed #Nasrallah: There is today a conspiracy against the #Resistance after the failure of the #American scheme and its tools in the region and the defeat of #Daesh Sayyed #Nasrallah: If “Israel” today has nothing to fear, it would have taken our oil pipelines, Block 9 and the #Lebanese oil rights Sayyed #Nasrallah: When #Tillerson came to #Beirut, he did not come for oil only. He came to say that there is a problem in #Lebanon that is #Hezbollah and the weapon of #Resistance must be resolved Sayyed #Nasrallah: When we entered the 1992 elections, we implemented Sayyed Abbas al-#Moussawi’s will to defend the #Resistance by preventing conspiracy against it Sayyed #Nasrallah: The great harvest that we have reached at the level of #Lebanon has costed us dear blood and it is our responsibility to keep it strong Sayyed #Nasrallah: When they meet at the #Saudi embassy and talk about setting up regulations and paying money, it means that the work on our regions has begun Sayyed #Nasrallah calls for a full review of what #Hezbollah provided to #Baalbek-#Hermel since 1982 until today on the moral, security, national, regional, cultural, social and service levels Sayyed #Nasrallah: We must spare no effort to get the largest electoral outcome so that our candidates reach #Parliament Sayyed #Nasrallah: The #relative law allows people to take their natural size in contrast to the law of majority Sayyed #Nasrallah: #Baalbek-#Hermel district is important because of its clear position in supporting the #Resistance
Guestbook mailinglist.php arabic site french site spanish site facebook twitter rss page
News Categories » NEWS » Americas » Americas...

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size  Print Page
Supreme Court Allows Trump Travel Ban to Take Effect Pending Appeal
Local Editor

The US Supreme Court said Monday that the government could fully enforce a revised ban on travelers from six mainly Muslim countries pending appeal, backing President Donald Trump in the year-long battle over the controversial measure.

No Ban protest

The court stayed October rulings from two lower courts that had blocked implementation of the ban on visitors from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen while legal challenges to it continued.

The third version of Trump's travel ban, unveiled in September, drew immediate challenges in federal appeals courts in Richmond, Virginia and San Francisco, California.

Plaintiffs argued that the measure targets Muslims in violation of the US Constitution and did not advance security goals as the government claimed.

The challengers convinced the lower courts to put implementation on hold while they and government lawyers fight out the legality of the policy.

But the Trump administration, which says the ban is crucial to protect US national security and deter terror attacks, secured strong support from the Supreme Court in a 7-2 vote to let the government move ahead while the appeals continue.

"We are not surprised by today's Supreme Court decision permitting immediate enforcement of the President's proclamation limiting travel from countries presenting heightened risks of terrorism," the White House said.

"The proclamation is lawful and essential to protecting our homeland. We look forward to presenting a fuller defense of the proclamation as the pending cases work their way through the courts," it added.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the nation's largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, criticized the ruling.

"This decision ignores the very real human consequences to American citizens and their families abroad imposed by President Trump's Muslim Ban 3.0," said CAIR National Litigation Director Lena Masri.

The Supreme Court justices said they expect the lower appeals courts to expedite their decisions, leaving open the possibility that the policy could return to the Supreme Court in yet another legal challenge to the White House.

The San Francisco court will hear the case on Wednesday and the Richmond court on Friday.

The ban also covers people from North Korea and a selection of senior officials from Venezuela, but its main focus is travelers from the six mainly Muslim countries.

Trump has battled to implement a travel ban since just after he became president on January 20, after having repeatedly promised during last year's election campaign to ban all Muslims from entering the United States.

Those promises have undermined the administration's argument in a series of court challenges that its policy is not Muslim-focused but rather based on security needs.

After Monday's court ruling the Department of Homeland Security said: "the administration's common sense travel restrictions on countries that do not meet basic security standards and do not share critical information with us about terrorists and criminals are designed to defend the homeland and keep Americans safe."

The initial ban was to be for 90 days, ostensibly to give the US and the targeted countries time to implement tougher and more thorough vetting procedures for visitors.

After rolling court battles, the 90 day ban was finally allowed in June. Meanwhile, vetting for US-bound travelers from every country has intensified.

But when the six-country ban expired in September, the administration sought to replace it with an open-ended ban, with Chad added to the list while Sudan was removed, and North Korea and Venezuela appended as well.

Immigration and civil rights activists maintain it still essentially targets Muslims, which would violate the US Constitution's guarantees of religious rights.

When Trump last week retweeted three video clips from an extremist British group that vilified Muslims, his critics said it supported the idea that his immigration policies were anti-Muslim.

"President Trump's anti-Muslim prejudice is no secret -- he has repeatedly confirmed it, including just last week on Twitter," said Omar Jadwat, director of the Immigrants' Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union.

"It's unfortunate that the full ban can move forward for now, but this order does not address the merits of our claims. We continue to stand for freedom, equality, and for those who are unfairly being separated from their loved ones."

Source: News Agencies, Edited by website team

05-12-2017 | 14:50


Name
E-Mail
Comment Title
Comment
Human Verification


News Coverage

Related News

Search
To Top