Alahednews
english.alahednews.com.lb
Ashoura 2017
Cholera Threat Possible in Bangladesh Rohingya Camps, WHO Warns Lebanese President: Hezbollah Defends Us from ‘Israel’ Most Americans Don’t Trust Trump, Poll Shows Syria: Iranian Drones Destroy Daesh Bases in Deir Ezzor NKorea Rally Provokes Trump Tweets Zarif: Tehran Could ‘Walk Away’ From Nuclear Deal Trump Restricts Visas from 8 Countries, Including NKorea Escalating Tension, Iraqi Kurds Head to Polls German Elections 2017: Merkel Wins 4th Term, Nationalists Rise Merkel Takes on Hard Right in Final German Vote Push Zionist Minister: #Israel Will be the First to Recognize #Iraqi #Kurdistan #Ankara Closes Al-Khabour Border Crossing with Northern #Iraq in One Direction #Saudi Forces Arrest 7 Religious Figures in #Qatif Earthquake Detected Near #NorthKorea Nuke Testing Facility #Russia Launches Caliber Missiles on Terrorists in #Syria #ParsonsGreen: #London Police Say Attack Could Have Been Worse Imam #Khamenei: #Trump's Idiotic Statements Due to Bankruptcy Imam #Khamenei: #US Angry Over Scheme Defeat in W #Asia Imam #Khamenei: #US Elites Should be Ashamed of Their President #ParsonsGreen: 5 Suspects Detained in #London Tube Attack
Guestbook mailinglist.php arabic site french site spanish site facebook twitter rss page
News Categories » NEWS » Americas » United States

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size  Print Page
US Court Deals Blow to Trump Travel Ban
Local Editor

Ruling that some refugees must be allowed into the country, a federal court in California dealt a new blow Thursday to the Trump administration's travel ban.

US President Donald Trump

It is the latest twist of the legal wrangling touched off by President Donald Trump's ban, first announced in January with little notice and widely criticized as discriminatory against Muslims. Trump says it is needed to keep out terrorists.

In the new ruling, the US Ninth Circuit of Appeals, based in San Francisco, upheld a ruling by a court in Hawaii, a decision against which the administration had appealed.

The new decision states that the ban must exclude "refugees who have a formal assurance from an agency within the United States that the agency will provide or ensure the provision of reception and placement services to that refugee."

It could pave the way for the entry of some 24,000 refugees whose asylum requests had already been approved.

And as the US Supreme Court had ruled in July, the three-judge panel in San Francisco confirmed that the ban cannot be applied to grandparents and other close family members living in six mainly Muslim countries and seeking to visit relatives in the US.

The Supreme Court ruled in late June that the 90-day travel ban, purportedly aimed at better screening out potential security risks, can be broadly enforced for travelers from the six mainly Muslim countries "who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."

Days later, the Trump administration interpreted that to mean that only "close family" was exempted. It defined this as the parents, spouses, children, sons- and daughters-in-law, siblings and step- and half-siblings of people in the US.

The California court said Wednesday the administration "does not offer a persuasive explanation for why a mother-in-law is clearly a bona fide relationship in the Supreme Court's prior reasoning, but a grandparent, grandchild, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew or cousin is not."

The San Francisco court was ruling on the issue because the Supreme Court had refused a Justice Department request that it define what it means by "bona fide relationship" and "close family."

The Justice Department issued a statement saying "we will now return to the Supreme Court to vindicate the executive branch duty to protect the nation."

The Supreme Court is scheduled to revisit the travel ban and study its constitutionality in October.

Source: News Agencies, Edited by website team

08-09-2017 | 11:44


Name
E-Mail
Comment Title
Comment
Human Verification


News Coverage

Related News

Search
To Top